both my own and neonknight's RS-B565-MH). do consider that many good/upgraded transfers shared during these latest few years were transferred on some cassette decks I did restore and modify with my own hands to improve their sound quality (i.e. Well, it's many years I also work on audio gear. such analog audio gear will never do justice to a good analog source but it would still be good enough to listen to CDs. there are so many cassette decks (but also so many amplifiers) where the signal passes through integrated circuits (the chips) which ruin the sound in a similar way as bad digital usually sounds. It will be easier to hear which capture will sound closer to the analog source listened without any digital conversion involved.Īlso, not any analog gear is good. In fact, if you wish to make a proper comparison (like I did myself) is to individually compare both a 16/44 and a 24/96 capture directly with the analog source they were captured from. because your digital hardware might be not good enough then the 24/96 playback is just flawed and with no meaningful sound quality differences compared to 16/44. Another short "pill" answer (i am on smartphone, will write something more detailed later, when i will be at my PC).Ĭomparing 16/44 and 24/96 might be pointless.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |